Bookkeeping versus accounting versus management information.
So what does this all mean?
Well unashamedly this post is a little bit of self promotion, but my real intention is more about trying to provide information and education for you – the small business owner.
Many of you will have previously followed my posts at www.kundunconsulting.com.au. And many of you will be aware of my thoughts on bookkeepers. In fact many of you have argued the point with me about the role of the bookkeeper. I am however compelled to spell out the role of the bookkeeper versus the other financial advisors in your employ – whether internal or external.
Let me give you something to think about. Go to seek.com.au. Type in accountant. Check out the number of results. Now try bookkeeper. Is it the same?
Of course not. Accountants are a very in demand skill set for corporate Australia. Bookkeepers really aren’t – they are tied to the small business market.
So why do so many small business people hire bookkeepers to perform all of their financial related tasks? Does that mean that small business is so much smarter than Corporate Australia and can get bookkeepers to perform the tasks that they get accountants to perform?
The point of all this is that both bookkeepers and accountants have their roles to perform. The bookkeepers are there to provide simple DATA ENTRY with a knowledge of the basic accounting treatment of those transactions.
Accountants are there to take that data entry and complete the financial reporting required to supply management with the information that they need to manage the business. A very good accountant will then understand how that strategically links with the business and provide more value via the interpretation of that information to assist you to make decisions.
Now I need to say this very clearly to ensure that you have complete clarity:
Bookkeepers CANNOT produce management information or financial reports. They SHOULD NOT be completing these tasks or offering these services. Clients SHOULD NOT be expecting this from them.
So right now you are probably asking why the ramble. Well today I met with a new client who I was referred to by their external accountant – we will discuss this later in the week – who had some concerns about what the bookkeeper was doing.
The 2009 financial reports produced by the bookkeeper showed a profit of 319,000. However July had invoices from their suppliers of $112,000 which related to periods prior to July. In effect the bookkeeper had overstated the profit by 30%. After our review and the subsequent reconciliations and adjustments we were able to sit down with the owner of the business and provide a true gross profit figure which highlighted that there were issues in his estimating area. Subsequent decisions have allowed us to improve profits to a more comfortable level and this will now be a business managed with an eye on the financial implications of every decision – and done with CORRECT financial information.
He thought that his bookkeeper should have been able to deal with all of this – particularly as she offered those services when he engaged her. And as my rant above highlights this is not and should never be the case.
Yes I engage bookkeepers to perform tasks for clients – but that is never the financial reporting. As an accountant and advisor I review the work performed and create the adjustments that accrual accounting requires. I never expect the bookkeeper – even though they can do the work due to the training methods that I use – to complete accrual entries without supervision.
Bottom line is that you shouldn’t either.
